Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A nonzero probability of the contrary outcome means the c... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Probabilistic reasoning does not yield a conclusion that the next ball will be a certain color, but rather that certain future observations are very likely given past observations

    A nonzero probability of the contrary outcome means the conclusion is not guaranteed

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Even when all 100 observed balls are white, yielding a probability of 0.99, ther...Observing 90 white balls out of 100 yields a probability of 91/102 ≈ 0.89 for th...Probabilistic reasoning does not yield a conclusion that the next ball will be a...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    If there is a non-trivial negative analogy, the probability of the con...77%A conclusion might be assigned a probability because it is deemed prim...76%A probabilistic a priori argument would not be defeated by the mere co...76%If the negation of a conclusion is conceivable, no demonstrative argum...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: induction-problem
    View source passageHide passage
    This is Laplace’s famous “rule of succession” (1814). Suppose on the basis of observing 90 white balls out of 100, we calculate by the rule of succession that the probability of the next ball being white is \(91/102=0.89\). It is quite conceivable that the next ball might be black. Even in the case, where all 100 balls have been white, so that the probability of the next ball being white is 0.99, there is still a small probability that the next ball is not white. What the probabilistic reasoning

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective