Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A person in a room can manipulate Chinese symbols accordi... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A classical computer does not genuinely understand language or meaning.

    A person in a room can manipulate Chinese symbols according to rules and produce correct outputs without understanding any Chinese.

    Consciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Related

    A classical computer does not genuinely understand language or meaning.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A classical computer operates by manipulating symbols according to formal rules,...
    Manipulating symbols according to rules, without any understanding, is sufficien...
    Therefore, correct input-output behavior does not entail understanding.

    Similar

    A classical computer operates by manipulating symbols according to for...80%Searle-in-the-room, or the room alone, cannot understand Chinese throu...79%The agent that understands Chinese could be distinct from the physical...78%Searle's only evidence that the system lacks understanding of Chinese ...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: dualism
    View source passageHide passage
    Both (b) and (c) seem to draw out the claim that a material system lacks understanding. John Searle’s famous ‘Chinese Room’ argument (Searle 1980; see also the entry on Chinese room argument) seems to support this conclusion, at least if the material system takes the form of a classical computer, manipulating symbols according to rules. Searle imagines himself in a room with a letter box through which strings of symbols are posted in, and, following a book of rules, he puts out symbols whic

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective