Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A physician is justified in performing an operation even without knowing the operation will save the patient
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
The principle of informed consent requires that patient autonomy, not merely clinical necessity, grounds the justification for medical intervention.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A physician's epistemic uncertainty about outcome must be disclosed to the patient, making the patient's consent—not the operation's uniqueness—the true justificatory basis.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Beauchamp and Childress's principle of non-maleficence holds that certain harm requires stronger justification than uncertain benefit, not weaker.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An operation with unknown probability of success imposes certain surgical trauma and risk, meaning the uncertainty of benefit cannot itself justify the intervention.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If there is any remedy for the patient's disease, it is the operation
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A treatment that is the only possible remedy provides justification for its use even under uncertainty of outcome
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.