Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A preference shaped by irrational evolutionary contingency provides no philosophical justification for concluding that continuation is what we are more deeply concerned with.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.All human preferences arise from evolutionary contingency; rejecting this undermines all value claims universally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Survival preferences persist across cultures precisely because they reflect deep, rational concerns about flourishing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim assumes we can identify 'deeper concerns' independent of our actual, evolved motivational structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Evolutionary origins of preferences don't establish their normative authority or reveal our true values.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A preference's contingent causal history is distinct from whether it deserves rational endorsement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We regularly reject evolved preferences (tribalism, status-seeking) as poor guides to what matters morally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.