Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A prime factorization of n with no factor less than m ser... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→FACTORIZATION is in NP ∩ coNP

    A prime factorization of n with no factor less than m serves as a polynomial-size certificate for non-membership in FACTORIZATION, and primality of factors is verifiable in polynomial time via AKS

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    AKS(as used in computational number theory)
    A famous fast algorithm (named after its inventors Agrawal, Kayal, and Saxena) that can quickly check whether a given number is prime.
    FACTORIZATION(Used as an example of a problem in NP ∩ coNP not currently known to be in P.)
    The computational problem: given ⟨n,m⟩, does n have a factor d with 1 < d ≤ m?
    Factor(as used in mathematics)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A number that divides evenly into another number; for example, 3 is a factor of 12 because 12 ÷ 3 = 4 with no remainder.
    Non-membership(as used in set theory and logic)
    Not belonging to or not being part of a particular group or category.
    Polynomial-size certificate(as used in computer science and computational complexity)
    A piece of evidence or proof that can be written down in a reasonably short way (the length grows at a manageable rate as the problem gets bigger), making it easy to verify.
    Primality(as used in mathematics and logic)
    The quality of being a prime number—a number that can only be divided evenly by 1 and itself, like 2, 3, 5, or 7.
    Prime factorization(as used in the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic)
    Breaking a number down into its prime number building blocks—for example, 12 breaks down into 2 × 2 × 3. Every number has exactly one way to do this.
    polynomial time(Used to characterize feasible computation)
    Computational time complexity expressed as t(x)=x^c, where c is a constant and x is the length of the input
    verifiable(The second category of meaningful sentences under verificationism; the text notes the precise meaning of 'verifiable' is contested)
    A sentence that can in principle be confirmed or disconfirmed through empirical observation

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    FACTORIZATION is in NP ∩ coNP

    Related

    A divisor d with 1 < d ≤ m of n serves as a polynomial-size certificate for memb...FACTORIZATION is in NP ∩ coNP

    Similar

    A prime factorization of n in which no factor is less than m serves as...93%A prime factorization of n in which no prime factor is less than m ser...92%Membership of ⟨n,m⟩ in the complement of FACTORIZATION can be certifie...85%The primality of individual factors in the factorization can be verifi...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    The graph \(G_{\phi}\) for the formula \((p_1 \vee p_2 \vee p_3) \wedge (\neg p_1 \vee p_2 \vee \neg p_3) \wedge (p_1 \vee \neg p_2 \vee \neg p_3)\). A reduction of \(3\text{-}\sc{SAT}\) to \(\sc{INDEPENDENT}\ \sc{SET}\) can now be described as follows: Let \(\phi\) be a \(3\text{-}\sc{CNF}\) formula consisting of \(n\) clauses as depicted above. We construct a graph \(G_{\phi} = \langle V,E \rangle\) consisting of \(n\)-triangles \(T_1,\ldots,T_n\) such that the nodes of \(T_i\) are respect

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective