Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A principle whose application conditions presuppose physi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The interaction principle does not assume monism

    A principle whose application conditions presuppose physical token-identity cannot be treated as neutral between dualist and monist interpretations of mind-body causation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Physical token-identity conditions embed assumptions about spatiotemporal location and material continuity specific to physicalism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Dualists deny that mental events are identical to physical tokens, so principles presupposing such identity beg the question against dualism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A truly neutral framework would apply equally whether mind-body causation involves physical tokens or non-physical substances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.All causal principles presuppose some metaphysical framework; neutrality regarding competing frameworks is logically impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Even dualists can accept physical token-identity for physical effects while denying it for mental causes—the principle remains applicable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A principle's presuppositions reveal its commitments without necessarily disqualifying it from explaining causal relations across frameworks.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedConsciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    A principle's presuppositions reveal its commitments without necessarily disqual...A truly neutral framework would apply equally whether mind-body causation involv...All causal principles presuppose some metaphysical framework; neutrality regardi...Dualists deny that mental events are identical to physical tokens, so principles...
    +3 moreShow less
    Even dualists can accept physical token-identity for physical effects while deny...Physical token-identity conditions embed assumptions about spatiotemporal locati...The interaction principle does not assume monism

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit