Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A probability measure that cannot shift its assignments i... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Keynes's framework permits no learning from experience and thus cannot adequately justify analogical reasoning when negative analogy exists

    A probability measure that cannot shift its assignments in response to accumulated negative instances fails the basic Bayesian coherence condition that posteriors must differ from priors given relevant evidence.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Bayesian
    # Bayesian Bayesian refers to a way of thinking about probability and uncertainty that starts with what you already believe, then updates that belief as you get new evidence. Rather than treating probability as just counting how often something happens, it treats it as a measure of how confident you are about something. This approach is named after Thomas Bayes, an 18th-century mathematician, and it's widely used today in everything from medical testing to spam filters because it mirrors how humans naturally learn and change their minds.
    Bayesian coherence(in epistemology (the study of knowledge))
    A rule stating that your beliefs should be logically consistent with each other and should change in a rational, mathematical way when you get new information.
    Posteriors(how confident you should be in a belief after seeing the evidence)
    Your updated beliefs or confidence level after considering new evidence.
    Priors(as used in probability and epistemology)
    Your initial assumptions or beliefs about how likely something is before you consider new evidence (like guessing the probability before looking at the facts).

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Probability measure(what the Mentaculus fails to provide for the Future Hypothesis)
    A mathematical tool that assigns probabilities to different possible outcomes in a consistent way, so they add up correctly and follow the rules of probability.
    Relevant evidence(Evidentialism)
    Evidence that bears on the truth of the proposition.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Keynes's framework permits no learning from experience and thus cannot adequatel...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective