Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A proper name like 'Smith' can be used with referential i... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Utterance ambiguity arising from speaker reference intentions should not be mistaken for lexical ambiguity of the word used

    A proper name like 'Smith' can be used with referential intentions that lead a speaker to refer to a different individual than the name's semantic referent (e.g., referring to Jones when seeing someone who resembles Smith)

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Key Terms

    philosophy of language(the broader field this statement belongs to)
    The area of philosophy that studies how language works, what words mean, and how we communicate with each other.
    proper name(Priscian's Latin grammar)
    A subdivision of the nomen that signifies a particular substance and its quality, and may also include apprehension of something common (an associated descriptive sense).
    referential intentions(as used in philosophy of language)
    What a speaker is actually trying to point to or talk about when they use a word, based on what's in their mind at that moment.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    semantic referent(as used in philosophy of language)
    The thing that a word is officially or standardly supposed to refer to—basically, what the word is supposed to mean or pick out.

    Related

    The ambiguity in such an utterance is at the level of the utterance, arising fro...The word 'Smith' is not itself lexically ambiguous between different individualsUtterance ambiguity arising from speaker reference intentions should not be mist...

    Similar

    Proper names must have a sense, not merely a referent.84%'Clark Kent' and 'Superman' are proper names that refer to the same ob...83%The names 'Superman' and 'Clark Kent' differ in sense despite being co...81%The proper name may also include the apprehension of something common ...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ambiguity
    View source passageHide passage
    The notion of definition here has to be taken as a heavy-weight notion: ‘bank’ is ambiguous even though you can ‘define’ it as ‘financial institution or river side’. However, we can get a reasonable grip on what Aristotle had in mind. ‘Uncle’ is not ambiguous because it has a single definition that covers both: x is an uncle iff x is the brother of y and y has a child. The test depends partly on how strict we are about what counts as a definition. And on the assumption that there are interesti

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective