Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A proposition counts as true only if its content is so cl... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Unshakable conviction in the face of serious, well-thought-out challenges is the criterion for truth

    A proposition counts as true only if its content is so clearly perceived that the will's affirmation cannot be shaken even by the systematic and sustained doubts of the Meditations

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Affirmation(in logic and language)
    The act of saying something is true or confirming a statement.
    Systematic doubt(as used in Descartes' method of finding certainty)
    A method of questioning beliefs in an organized, thorough way—intentionally trying to prove your own ideas wrong to test how solid they really are.
    The Meditations(as a historical philosophical work referenced in this statement)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A famous book written by philosopher René Descartes in the 1600s where he systematically doubts everything he believes to find what he can be absolutely certain about.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs
    proposition(Used in the context of a semantic theory sensitive to differences in subject matter.)
    The content expressed by a sentence, individuated at least in part by the subject matter of the sentence and the contents of its subsentential expressions.
    the will(as used in metaphysics and philosophy of mind)
    Your desires, drives, and personal goals—basically what you want or need for yourself. In philosophy, 'the will' often refers to this force inside us that pushes us to pursue what we want.

    Related

    Mere stubbornness can produce convictions that are not doubtedThe relevant criterion is not simply that a proposition is not doubted, nor that...Unshakable conviction in the face of serious, well-thought-out challenges is the...

    Similar

    If a proposition is known to be true solely because it is clearly and ...84%Therefore, if a proposition were true, that proposition must exist as ...81%Conceptual propositions can be recognized as true or false through mer...81%Knowledge requires there to be true propositions about the subject mat...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: descartes
    View source passageHide passage
    As mentioned in 3.1, Descartes held that any act of judgment, such as the affirmation “I think, therefore I am,” involves both the intellect and will. The intellect perceives or represents the content of the judgment; the will affirms or denies that content. In the face of genuine clarity and distinctness, “a great light in the intellect” is followed by “a great inclination of the will” (7:59). The inclination of the will is so strong that it amounts to compulsion; we cannot help but so affirm.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective