Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A proposition that must already be in place for E8 to count as evidence cannot coherently be justified by that same evidence without vicious circularity.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Some background propositions can be justified through coherence across multiple evidence types, not merely by any single evidence source alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distinguishing between 'presupposition' and 'conclusion' depends on logical structure, not just temporal or explanatory order of discovery.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A proposition P can be both a precondition for E8's interpretation AND independently justified through separate arguments or empirical tests.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Evidence E8 functions as evidence only within a framework of background assumptions that constrain what counts as relevant or probative.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If P is a background assumption enabling E8's evidential status, then appealing to E8 to justify P assumes P's truth from the outset.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Circular reasoning occurs when the conclusion is among the premises needed to establish those premises, creating epistemic dependency loops.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.