Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A reason that causally produces action must be internal to the agent, so facts qua external states cannot play the motivating role.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
External facts causally constrain which internal states are rationally justified; rationality requires responsiveness to external reality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A fire's heat directly causes pain and withdrawal regardless of whether the agent pre-reflectively represents it—causation doesn't require internalization.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction between 'external fact' and 'internal representation of it' is metaphysically unclear; what counts as 'internal' needs defense.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Only internal mental states (beliefs, desires) can directly cause neural/behavioral changes without additional intermediaries.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
External facts are epistemically inert until represented internally; the representation, not the fact itself, motivates action.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If external facts alone motivated action, agents with identical internal states but different external environments would act identically, which they don't.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.