Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A reasonable morality understands social justice obligati... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Society's obligations to provide for its members are limited, not open-ended and unbounded.

    A reasonable morality understands social justice obligations as limited.

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty

    Connections

    4 topics

    Moral Responsibility2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Consequentialism
    1 linked
    Problem of Evil1 linked
    Virtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    Justice is a practical ideal, not one that aims to correct all bad luck of any s...Society's obligations to provide for its members are limited, not open-ended and...The quality of life an individual reaches also depends on chance factors for whi...The quality of life an individual reaches depends considerably on choices and ac...

    Similar

    Equality of condition, if part of social justice, must reflect an appr...79%Social justice obligations of society are limited, not open-ended.78%Any component of social justice must conform to the same limits that a...77%Retributive justice must ultimately be justified in a larger moral con...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: egalitarianism
    View source passageHide passage
    Another thought that motivates the family of equality-of-resources ideals is that society's obligations by way of providing for its members are limited. A just and egalitarian society is not plausibly held to be obligated to do whatever turns out to be necessary to bring it about that their members attain any given level or share of quality of life. The reason for this is that the quality of life (the degree to which one attains valuable agency and well-being goals) that any individual reaches o

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective