Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A revisionist naturalist regards health and disease as fe... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Scientific biomedical inquiry may determine that a condition is a disease even when human intuition says it is not, and in such cases we should accept that judgment rather than revise the concept to exclude it.

    A revisionist naturalist regards health and disease as features of the world to be discovered by biomedical investigation, not constrained by everyday concepts.

    Bioethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Bioethics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    Facts about physiological and psychological functioning obtain independently of ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Scientific biomedical inquiry may determine that a condition is a disease even w...
    Scientific inquiry can conclude that people with a condition are suffering from ...

    Similar

    Treating diseases as putative natural kinds allows for a revisionist b...82%Philosophers should aim to naturalize disease by first understanding g...76%Our concept of disorder could be naturalist even if no actual diseases...76%Scientific biomedical inquiry may determine that a condition is a dise...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: health-disease
    View source passageHide passage
    Revisionist naturalists argue that facts about physiological and psychological functioning, like other biological facts, obtain independently of human conceptions of the world. Our intuitions might tell us that a condition is not a disease. But scientific inquiry might conclude that people with the condition are really suffering from a biological malfunction. In that case, a conservative would recommend finessing the analysis to ensure that the concept of disease does not cover this case. A revi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective