Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A rule whose reliability cannot be established without in... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Rule-circularity is not vicious, unlike premise-circularity

    A rule whose reliability cannot be established without invoking that very rule fails the reflective access condition, regardless of whether reliability is assumed in premises or embedded in the rule itself.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Reflective access requires justification independent of the rule itself, else we merely assume what needs proving.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Circular reasoning—whether in premises or embedded in rules—fails to establish legitimacy of the rule being justified.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A rule's reliability cannot ground itself; external epistemic standards are necessary to validate any inferential tool.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Some rules (like logic itself) are foundational; requiring external justification leads to infinite regress or arbitrariness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Circularity in rules differs from circular reasoning: using a rule within its own domain need not be epistemically vicious.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Reflective access may require only coherence and self-consistency, not independence from the rule being evaluated.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Circularity / Circular reasoning(logic and epistemology)
    When you try to prove something by using that very thing as evidence—like saying 'this rule works because this rule says so,' which doesn't actually prove anything.
    Embedded(describes conditionals appearing inside disjunctions or other sentences)
    When one sentence or clause is placed inside another larger sentence, like nesting boxes—for example, 'if it rains' is embedded in 'John said that if it rains, he'll stay home.'
    Reflective access condition(epistemology)
    A requirement that we be able to think about and understand *why* a rule works without getting stuck in circular reasoning.
    premises(as used in logic and philosophical arguments)
    Starting statements or assumptions that are used to support a conclusion—like the opening claims in an argument that lead to a final point.
    reliability(what induction is trying to prove about itself)
    The quality of consistently producing correct or trustworthy results; something you can depend on to work.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    A rule's reliability cannot ground itself; external epistemic standards are nece...Circular reasoning—whether in premises or embedded in rules—fails to establish l...Circularity in rules differs from circular reasoning: using a rule within its ow...Reflective access may require only coherence and self-consistency, not independe...
    +3 moreShow less
    Reflective access requires justification independent of the rule itself, else we...Rule-circularity is not vicious, unlike premise-circularitySome rules (like logic itself) are foundational; requiring external justificatio...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit