Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A science whose observational base is reflexively altered... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Economics does not pass methodological muster as an empirical science

    A science whose observational base is reflexively altered by the act of theorizing cannot maintain the theory-observation distinction required for empirical confirmation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Quantum mechanics shows measurement itself alters observables, making pristine theory-independent observations impossible in principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If theorizing changes what we can observe, we cannot use observations to independently verify theories without circular reasoning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Social sciences demonstrate how theoretical frameworks reshape data collection, rendering confirmation claims epistemically suspect.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Theory-laden observation differs from theory-determined observation; we can still compare competing theories against shared data.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Reflexive alteration of observables doesn't eliminate empirical constraints—theories still succeed or fail against reality's resistance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Historical science progressed despite theory-laden observations, suggesting the distinction survives partial contamination practically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Economics does not pass methodological muster as an empirical scienceHistorical science progressed despite theory-laden observations, suggesting the ...If theorizing changes what we can observe, we cannot use observations to indepen...Quantum mechanics shows measurement itself alters observables, making pristine t...
    +3 moreShow less
    Reflexive alteration of observables doesn't eliminate empirical constraints—theo...Social sciences demonstrate how theoretical frameworks reshape data collection, ...Theory-laden observation differs from theory-determined observation; we can stil...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit