Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A-simultaneity is defined as occurring 'at the same now'. — Carmelics
    Home/Afterlife & Death
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Connected to 2 discussions

    Supports→If two events are B-simultaneous and they B-occur, they are A-simultaneous.
    Supports→If two events occur at the same atemporal now and A-occur, they are A-simultaneous.

    A-simultaneity is defined as occurring 'at the same now'.

    Afterlife & Death
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Afterlife & Death

    Related

    B-simultaneity is having the same temporal B-location in some B-series.If two events are B-simultaneous and they B-occur, they are A-simultaneous.If two events are located at the same B-temporal location that is now, they shar...If two events occur at the same atemporal now and A-occur, they are A-simultaneo...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Afterlife & Death
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    +1 more
    Show less
    Two events that share the same atemporal now and occur now satisfy the condition...

    Similar

    B-simultaneity is having the same temporal B-location in some B-series...86%The difficulties with ET-simultaneity arise whether it is two-place or...80%ET-simultaneity is not reflexive.79%Stump and Kretzmann's emphasis that simultaneity is a three-place rela...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: eternity
    View source passageHide passage
    Now return to Leftow’s view. Let A-occurring be occurring now, and let B-occurring be occurring at a certain temporal location t that is now. (This is intended to be continuous with McTaggart’s distinction.) B-occurring entails A-occurring: if something occurs at a temporal B-location t that is now, it occurs now. But not vice versa. Something can occur now without occurring at a temporal B-location t that is now. Something can, that is, A-occur without B-occurring. Now define A-simultaneity as occurring “at the same now”. B-simultaneity, by contrast, is having the same temporal B-location in ...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective