Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A skeptic can coherently question re-identification proce... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→It is incoherent to be sceptical about the identification procedures that confirm spatio-temporal re-identifications while still thinking within the spatio-temporal framework.

    A skeptic can coherently question re-identification procedures as an internal theoretical revision while provisionally operating within the framework, just as scientists question measurement axioms.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Scientific practice routinely revises foundational assumptions (e.g., simultaneity in relativity) while maintaining empirical coherence within theories.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Internal critique doesn't require external standpoint; mathematicians question axioms using derivations from those same axioms without incoherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Re-identification procedures are conventional rather than metaphysically necessary, making provisional skepticism about them rationally permissible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Re-identification criteria are constitutive of what 'the same object' means; questioning them while using that concept is performatively self-undermining.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Scientific axiom revision requires alternative frameworks with equal explanatory power; skepticism about re-identification offers no such replacement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Operating within a framework while denying its identity conditions creates practical incoherence: one cannot coherently reason about persistence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Coherently(as describing how these functions work together)
    In a way that is logically consistent and doesn't contradict itself.
    Internal theoretical revision(the type of questioning the skeptic is doing—fixing problems rather than rejecting everything)
    A change or improvement to how a theory works from within, without throwing out the entire theory itself.
    Provisionally(describing how theoretical posits are used)
    In a temporary way; accepted for now while remaining open to changing it if evidence suggests you should.
    Re-identification procedures(the specific thing the skeptic is questioning)
    The methods we use to confirm that something is the same thing we encountered before (like recognizing your friend in a crowd).
    axioms(Stumpf, 1891)
    Propositions that we assume to be true and necessary, originating in the content of judgments.
    framework(Carnap's philosophy of language and logic)
    A structured system of rules or language that must be in place for rational discourse to be possible.
    skeptic(The side usually taken by Academics in epistemological debates)
    One who challenges the possibility of knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Internal critique doesn't require external standpoint; mathematicians question a...It is incoherent to be sceptical about the identification procedures that confir...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Operating within a framework while denying its identity conditions creates pract...
    Re-identification criteria are constitutive of what 'the same object' means; que...
    +3 moreShow less
    Re-identification procedures are conventional rather than metaphysically necessa...Scientific axiom revision requires alternative frameworks with equal explanatory...Scientific practice routinely revises foundational assumptions (e.g., simultanei...