Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A solution to a coordination problem, once established, may become entrenched even if a different rule would be more 'reasonable.'

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Rawlsian reflective equilibrium demands that entrenched rules be continuously tested against principles of fairness, not merely stability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A rule that persists due to path dependency rather than rational endorsement lacks the normative legitimacy required to bind participants.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Habermas argues that legitimacy requires ongoing communicative rationality, meaning no coordination norm is exempt from discursive challenge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Entrenchment that silences deliberation transforms a provisional social arrangement into an illegitimate constraint on rational autonomy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • The benefits of everyone conforming to the same rule outweigh the costs of changing to a different rule.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42