Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A speaker can systematically misapply a term from desire while still violating the correctness conditions constitutive of that term's semantic content.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If correctness conditions constitutively determine semantic content, violating them means using a different content altogether.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Systematic misapplication suggests the speaker's term has acquired new correctness conditions through their practice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
There is no principled distinction between 'violating' versus 'transforming' a term's semantic content through use.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Semantic content is constituted by correctness conditions independent of any speaker's dispositions or intentions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Systematic misapplication occurs when usage patterns consistently deviate from those constitutive correctness conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A speaker can be disposed to misuse a term while grasping its semantic content through community standards.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.