Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A statement can be sinnlos within a formal system while remaining syntactically well-formed and operationally significant, placing game formalism closer to sinnlos than unsinnig.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Sinnlos applies to statements within language attempting reference; game rules aren't statements but constitutive prescriptions with different logical status.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Operational significance entails pragmatic content and context-dependent meaning, which exceeds Wittgenstein's notion of sinnlos formalism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If games are sinnlos, they become indistinguishable from meaningless formal systems, yet players understand and value them cognitively.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Wittgenstein distinguished sinnlos (senseless) from unsinnig (nonsensical): sinnlos statements follow rules but lack empirical content, like tautologies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Game rules are internally coherent and operationally functional, yet make no claims about external reality, matching sinnlos precisely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Chess moves are well-formed per rules and meaningful within the system, but the system itself makes no truth-claims about the world.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.