Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A system that admits polynomial-size proofs of PHP_n is n... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The proof system P1 (and systems P2, P3 which efficiently simulate P1) is not refuted by the PHP hardness result for resolution

    A system that admits polynomial-size proofs of PHP_n is not shown to be super-polynomially hard on PHP

    Proof of definition segmentsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeProof of definition segments

    Connections

    1 topic

    All sources support it2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Buss (1987) showed that P1 admits proofs of PHP_n of size polynomial in nP2 and P3 can be shown to efficiently simulate P1The proof system P1 (and systems P2, P3 which efficiently simulate P1) is not re...

    Similar

    The system P_1 admits proofs of PHP_n of size polynomial in n.87%A proof system is polynomially bounded only if all tautologies of size...85%No proof system has yet been shown to be polynomially bounded84%Resolution is not polynomially bounded as a proof system84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    for all propositional formulas \(\phi\), \(\phi \in \sc{VALID}\) if and only if \(\vdash_{\mathcal{P}_i} \phi\) for \(i \in \{1,2,3\}\). In the context of complexity theory, it is convenient to reformulate the definition of a proof system as a mapping \(\mathcal{P}: \{0,1\}^* \rightarrow \sc{VALID}\) whose domain consist of all binary string and whose range is the class of all valid formulas. Recall, for instance, that a Hilbert derivation is a finite sequences of formulas \(\psi_1,\ldots,\psi_

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective