Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A term that picks out different properties relative to different contexts of evaluation satisfies the standard semantic criterion for non-rigidity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Context-sensitivity (picking different properties) may reflect pragmatics or reference-fixing, not semantic non-rigidity per se.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Some rigid designators can appear context-sensitive at surface level while maintaining invariant reference at the semantic level.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The criterion conflates picking out *different properties* with picking out *different referents*, which are distinct phenomena.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Kripke's standard criterion defines non-rigid designators as terms varying reference across possible worlds based on evaluation context.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Natural language terms like 'actual' and 'that person' demonstrably pick out different properties depending on context of use.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A semantic criterion gains explanatory power by capturing this context-sensitivity rather than treating all terms uniformly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.