A testimony-grounded thought like 'I am anxious' can still be IEM regarding self-reference even if the anxiety's character is misreported, since the subject-identification is not in question.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Character (of an emotion or experience)(philosophy of mind): The specific qualities or 'feel' of something—for example, anxiety might feel shaky or tight, which is its character.
IEM(as the main concept being explained): Short for 'Immunity to Error through Misidentification'—the idea that when you think about your own experiences (like 'I am in pain'), you can't be wrong about *who* is having that experience, even if you're wrong about other details.
Misreported(epistemology and self-knowledge): Described or stated incorrectly; for example, saying your anxiety feels one way when it actually feels different.
Self-reference(the problem Tarski's system solves): When a statement or rule refers to itself, which can sometimes create logical contradictions (like the classic 'this sentence is false').

Based on where you are in your exploration