Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A theory that entails more but applies to fewer actual me... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The realist (universal magnitudes) interpretation of measurement axioms is more general than the empiricist interpretation

    A theory that entails more but applies to fewer actual measurement practices is less general in the philosophically relevant sense, per Quine's criterion of ontological parsimony.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Ontological parsimony favors theories positing fewer entities, making scope-limited theories with minimal commitments philosophically superior.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A theory applying to fewer actual practices generates fewer false positives and explains only what genuinely occurs, avoiding idle theoretical posits.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Quine's criterion prioritizes what exists over what could exist, so applicability to actual measurement practices is the relevant metric for generality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Generality and parsimony are distinct virtues; a theory can be ontologically sparse yet broadly applicable—these dimensions don't trade off necessarily.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Restricting theories to current measurement practices ignores future discoveries; Quine himself emphasized that observation and theory evolve together.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Entailing more consequences with broader applicability may reveal deeper unifying principles, which Quine values—parsimony applies to *kinds* of entities, not scope.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    A theory applying to fewer actual practices generates fewer false positives and ...Entailing more consequences with broader applicability may reveal deeper unifyin...Generality and parsimony are distinct virtues; a theory can be ontologically spa...Ontological parsimony favors theories positing fewer entities, making scope-limi...
    +3 moreShow less
    Quine's criterion prioritizes what exists over what could exist, so applicabilit...Restricting theories to current measurement practices ignores future discoveries...The realist (universal magnitudes) interpretation of measurement axioms is more ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit