Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A theory that is not committed to identifying who is attending fails to explain what aesthetic attitude actually selects or excludes.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Aesthetic properties may be objective features of objects themselves, independent of any particular attendee's identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Identifying attendees risks collapsing aesthetics into psychology, confusing subjective response with objective judgment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A theory can explain selection through formal features and contextual conditions without positing specific attendee identities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Aesthetic attitude involves selective attention—what we attend to shapes what we perceive as aesthetically relevant.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without identifying the attendee's perspective, we cannot explain why the same object differs aesthetically across viewers.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Selection requires a selector: ignoring who attends obscures the mechanism by which aesthetic properties become salient.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.