A theory that requires ad hoc stipulations about which counterfactual variations 'count' violates the Humean demand for a purely extensional, non-intensionalreduction of causalfacts.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
A property of relations (like material implication) that Nagel claimed Reichenbach's probability implication lacks
intensional(as used in logic and philosophy of language)
Relating to meaning, context, or how something is described, rather than just what the thing is—for example, 'the morning star' and 'the evening star' refer to the same object (Venus) but intensionally they're different descriptions.
reduction (reductive explanation)(used when a theory tries to show that complicated ideas actually come from simpler building blocks)
Explaining something by breaking it down into simpler, more basic parts or principles.