Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A time traveler is unable to retro-kill a person who is alive at the time of the attempted killing
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Lewis's 'can' is indexical to a set of facts: the traveler CAN kill relative to their abilities, skills, and proximity to the target.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The impossibility of retro-killing conflates two senses of 'unable': local inability (lacking means) and global inability (logical inconsistency).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A time traveler facing a living target has no local incapacity, so the inability claim must rest on contested metaphysical necessity, not practical constraint.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Retro-killing does not change the past but rather constitutes part of the original causal history of the target's death.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the target dies at time T2 after the traveler arrives at T1 < T2, the past is not altered but simply contains the killing event.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Retro-killing a person would require changing the past
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
One is unable to change the past
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.