A transcendentally incoherent negation cannot serve as Hume's criterion for the absence of a demonstrative argument, since that criterion presupposes empiricist constraints Kant rejects.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Empiricist constraints(restrictions placed by empiricist philosophy): Limitations or rules that say we should only accept explanations based on what we can actually observe and measure, not hidden or invisible forces.
Hume, David(as referenced for identifying the is-ought problem): An 18th-century Scottish philosopher famous for pointing out that you can't logically jump from describing how things are to claiming how they ought to be.
Kant, Immanuel(as an example of a pre-statistical thinker): An 18th-century German philosopher who explored how the human mind shapes what we can know and how we understand reality.
Transcendentally incoherent(describing a type of logical problem): Something that contradicts the basic conditions necessary for knowledge or experience to be possible at all, according to Kant's philosophy.

Based on where you are in your exploration