Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A very risk-averse impartial observer applying expected u... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The impartial observer argument does not successfully establish utilitarianism as the correct criterion for social welfare

    A very risk-averse impartial observer applying expected utility maximization may converge on the maximin criterion rather than utilitarianism

    ConsequentialismJustice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Social Contract2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Not all versions of utilitarianism measure individual utility in a way that can ...The impartial observer argument does not successfully establish utilitarianism a...The impartial observer argument requires that individual utilities be measurable...There is little reason to believe that a utilitarian social welfare computation ...

    Similar

    Criticism directed against expected utility maximization does not nece...80%The impartial observer argument requires that individual utilities be ...78%The expected utility criterion does not necessarily follow from utilit...77%Expected-utility maximization is not the best general model of human d...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: economic-justice
    View source passageHide passage
    Harsanyi may be viewed as the last representative of the old welfare economics, to which he made a major contribution in the form of two arguments. The first one is often called the “impartial observer argument”. An impartial observer should decide for society as if she had an equal chance of becoming anyone in the considered population. This is a risky situation in which the standard decision criterion is expected utility. The computation of expected utility, in this equal probability case, yie

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective