Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A violation of Outcome Independence (OI) implies relational holism
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Relational holism requires that relata lack intrinsic properties fixing their relations, but OI violations are compatible with particles retaining intrinsic states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Teller's relational holism demands irreducible relations as ontological primitives, yet OI violations can be explained by separable hidden-variable structures lacking such primitives.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Particularism's failure entails only that correlations are not determined by separate intrinsic states, which is equally consistent with property holism rather than relational holism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Healey distinguishes property holism from relational holism, and the inference from non-particularism to relational holism illicitly collapses this distinction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Particularism implies Outcome Independence (OI)
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If a condition implies OI, then a violation of OI implies a violation of that condition
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.