Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A virtuous disposition that takes pleasure in its own exercise risks collapsing into what Kant calls pathological self-love dressed in moral clothing.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Pleasure in virtue's exercise can indicate flourishing character, not corruption—Aristotle argued eudaimonia requires delighting in good action.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The distinction between 'pathological' and 'moral' motives may be false; virtuous people naturally experience positive emotions about their character.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Empirically, people motivated by both duty AND satisfaction often act more reliably virtuously than those motivated by duty alone under strain.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
When virtue becomes pleasurable, agents may unconsciously seek opportunities to exercise it for emotional reward rather than moral duty.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Kant distinguished pathological motives (pleasure-based) from moral motives (duty-based), and conflating them undermines authentic moral agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Self-congratulation about one's virtue is psychologically difficult to distinguish from genuine virtue when pleasure reinforces the behavior.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.