Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A will determined in its very act of willing by an external cause—even one aligned with its nature—lacks the sourcehood required for genuine freedom.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
No causal chain is purely 'internal'—all willing depends on prior causes (genetics, neural states, reasons). Absolute sourcehood is incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A cause aligned with one's stable character and values can constitute authentic agency, even if externally influenced in origin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Freedom requires acting on one's own desires and reasons, not independence from all causation. External alignment needn't undermine this.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Sourcehood requires that the will's determination originates from the agent's own evaluative capacities, not external causal chains.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
External determination—even if harmonious with nature—bypasses the agent's deliberative process, making outcomes merely happen through them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Alignment with nature doesn't constitute self-governance; a river flowing downhill aligns with its nature but lacks agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.