Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Absolute space exists as a real, immovable container independent of material bodies, as Newton argued in the Scholium to the Principia.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Absolute space is unobservable and causally inert—we only ever measure relative positions, making it metaphysically superfluous by Occam's razor.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Einstein's relativity successfully predicts all phenomena Newton explained without positing absolute space, showing it is not necessary for physics.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rotational effects in Newton's bucket are explicable via inertial frames relative to distant masses (Mach's principle), requiring no absolute container.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Motion and acceleration require a reference frame; absolute space provides the unique, objective frame Newton's laws require to be determinate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Rotation exhibits genuine physical effects (centrifugal force in bucket experiment) only explicable if space itself is absolute, not relational.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without absolute space, the distinction between true motion and mere relative displacement becomes incoherent and unmeasurable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.