Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Acceptance of the principle of non-contradiction is a nec... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The skeptic cannot intelligibly raise doubts about the principle of non-contradiction, because accepting the principle of non-contradiction is a necessary condition for having meaningful thought at all.

    Acceptance of the principle of non-contradiction is a necessary condition for meaningful thought and expression.

    Philosophy of LanguageSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPhilosophy of Language

    Related

    The skeptic cannot intelligibly raise doubts about the principle of non-contradi...The skeptic's doubt about the principle of non-contradiction must be meaningfull...Therefore, the skeptic's doubt cannot be intelligibly stated or expressed.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The skeptic cannot intelligibly raise doubts about the principle of no...86%Principles such as the principle of non-contradiction cannot be obtain...86%The skeptic's doubt about the principle of non-contradiction must be m...84%Passage 612A–B is too ambiguous to support any substantial claims abou...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: transcendental-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    The first response takes its inspiration from a re-consideration of the Strawsonian transcendental arguments that were criticised by Stroud, but offers a different interpretation of them in the light of that critique. Thus, it is suggested, the mistake is to see Strawson’s argument as straightforwardly world-directed in the way that it was presented earlier, as offering a direct response to the skeptic by proving what the skeptic doubts. Rather, it is said, the strategy is more like Aristotle’s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective