Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Acceptance of theistic hope provides reason to act as if theism were true
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Acting 'as if' theism were true without believing it constitutes a form of self-deception that undermines rational integrity (Clifford's evidentialist principle).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Pragmatic reasons for action cannot substitute for epistemic reasons when the action involves sincere religious practice requiring genuine assent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Hope, unlike belief, lacks the propositional commitment required to generate reasons for action directed at truth-tracking outcomes (per Bratman's planning theory of intention).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An agent who merely hopes theism is true but does not believe it will systematically discount theistic considerations when they conflict with known secular costs.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Hope in theism motivates action oriented toward theism being true
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Acting from hope does not require believing theism to be true
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.