Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    According to standard usage, Meinongianism entails that n... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Meinongianism does not provide a view clearly distinct from platonism, but merely creates the illusion of a different view by altering the meaning of 'exist'.

    According to standard usage, Meinongianism entails that numbers and universals exist.

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Related

    Any view that posits numbers and universals as non-spatiotemporal existents ther...Meinongianism does not provide a view clearly distinct from platonism, but merel...Meinongianism does not take numbers and universals to exist in spacetime.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    On the standard meaning of 'exist', any object that has any being at all exists.

    Similar

    Essence, for Aristotle, must not only be universal across the kind but...80%Man is universal because man is understood universally by the intellec...79%Transgeneric terms do not signify a universal.78%Meinongianism does not take numbers and universals to exist in spaceti...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: platonism
    View source passageHide passage
    Meinongianism has been almost universally rejected by philosophers. The standard argument against it (see, e.g., Quine (1948), p. 3, and Lewis (1990)) is that it does not provide a view that is clearly distinct from platonism and merely creates the illusion of a different view by altering the meaning of the term ‘exist’. The idea here is that on the standard meaning of ‘exist’, any object that has any being at all exists, and so according to standard usage, Meinongianism entails that numbers and

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective