Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Achinstein's formal analogy between swans and line segmen... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The proposed analogical inference rule (5) is unacceptable as a general rule.

    Achinstein's formal analogy between swans and line segments — mapping 'has the same color as' to 'is congruent with' on the basis of shared reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity — satisfies rule (5) but clearly establishes nothing about swans or line segments.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Achinstein(the subject of the logical argument being discussed)
    A philosopher who studied how we reason by comparing different things; he's referenced here for a specific example he created about swans and line segments.
    Mapping(how Achinstein connects properties between the two subjects)
    In logic, this means connecting or matching one thing to another by showing how they correspond—like saying 'this property in swans works the same way as that property in line segments.'

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Rule (5)(a criterion that the analogy succeeds in meeting)
    A specific criterion or standard (the fifth one in whatever list is being discussed) that the analogy is being tested against to see if it's logically valid.
    Symmetry(one of the three shared logical properties between the two comparisons)
    A logical property meaning if A relates to B in some way, then B relates to A the same way—like if swan A is the same color as swan B, then swan B is the same color as swan A.
    congruent(Kant, Prolegomena 4:286)
    Capable of being superimposed or made to coincide exactly; used contrastively with incongruent counterparts which share all relational properties but cannot be superimposed.
    formal analogy(Hesse (1966); Bartha (2010: 195, 209))
    A relationship between two domains that are interpretations of the same formal theory, linked to common mathematical structure; includes nomic isomorphism as a special case and extends, on Bartha's definition, to any two features occupying corresponding positions in formally analogous theories
    reflexivity(Relational models in modal logic)
    A property of a relation R on W such that every state w stands in relation R to itself; corresponds to the Veracity axiom in epistemic logic (what is known is true)
    transitivity(Applied to the temporal relation 'earlier than' on a set of worlds W)
    A property of a relation R such that if wRv and vRu, then wRu

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    The only substantive requirement introduced by rule (5) is that there be a nonem...The proposed analogical inference rule (5) is unacceptable as a general rule.There exist analogical arguments satisfying this condition that establish no pri...

    Similar

    Some similarities are known to be utterly irrelevant to the hypothetic...84%Material analogy and formal analogy are independent of one another72%High-order relations can be achieved cheaply, as demonstrated by Achin...70%Counting surface similarities between source and target domains does n...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: reasoning-analogy
    View source passageHide passage
    Argumentation theorists also make use of tools such as speech act theory (Bermejo-Luque 2012), argumentation schemes and dialogue types (Macagno et al. 2017; Walton and Hyra 2018) to distinguish different types of analogical argument. Arguments by analogy are also discussed in the vast literature on scientific models and model-based reasoning, following the lead of Hesse (1966). Bailer-Jones (2002) draws a helpful distinction between analogies and models. ” In brief, models are tools for predic

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective