Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Act utilitarianism avoids this bifurcation by maintaining... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Sanction utilitarianism has disadvantages that act utilitarianism does not

    Act utilitarianism avoids this bifurcation by maintaining a single evaluative standard: the act that produces the most utility is both obligatory and the proper object of approval.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Object of approval(as used in ethics)
    Something that deserves to be praised, endorsed, or considered morally good.
    act utilitarianism(Used as the contrast case to sanction utilitarianism.)
    A form of utilitarianism that defines the rightness and wrongness of an act directly in terms of the utility of that act.
    bifurcation(Cited as a global behavior predictable by chaos models)
    A sudden qualitative change in the behavior of a nonlinear dynamical system occurring at specific control parameter values.
    evaluative standard(as something each work generates for itself)
    A set of criteria or rules used to judge whether something is good, bad, successful, or unsuccessful.
    obligatory(deontic logic / possible worlds semantics)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    A proposition p is obligatory if and only if p holds in all i-acceptable worlds
    utility(Mill's qualification distinguishing his conception of utility from narrower hedonistic or preference-based interpretations.)
    Utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being — not mere immediate pleasure or preference satisfaction.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Sanction utilitarianism has disadvantages that act utilitarianism does not

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective