Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Acting badly is morally impermissible even when it would ... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→When being happy requires acting badly, one's happiness must be sacrificed.

    Acting badly is morally impermissible even when it would produce happiness.

    ConsequentialismVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsConsequentialism

    Related

    The demands of virtue or morality trump other values in life.When being happy requires acting badly, one's happiness must be sacrificed.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Wagering for God is morally impermissible because it may require corru...82%Demoralization is morally undesirable80%The highest good can only be pursued through moral action; no shortcut...80%A truly moral person cannot make their commitment to morality continge...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: happiness
    View source passageHide passage
    In fact there is a broad consensus, or near-consensus, among ethical theorists on a doctrine we might call the priority of virtue: broadly and crudely speaking, the demands of virtue or morality trump other values in life.[27] We ought above all to act and live well, or at least not badly or wrongly. This view need not take the strong form of insisting that we must always act as virtuously as possible, or that moral reasons always take precedence. But it does mean, at least, that when being ha

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective