Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Adjudicating such interpretive conflicts requires a mode ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Mutual perspective taking is required for adjudicating conflicts over the interpretation of behavior in social practices.

    Adjudicating such interpretive conflicts requires a mode of practical reasoning that coordinates multiple perspectives.

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Mutual perspective taking constitutes its own mode of practical reasoning.Mutual perspective taking is required for adjudicating conflicts over the interp...Neither the interpreter's nor the observer's perspectives are sufficient to spec...

    Similar

    Mutual perspective taking constitutes its own mode of practical reason...81%Mutual perspective taking is required for adjudicating conflicts over ...78%Such conflicts among moral beliefs are pervasive enough to undermine a...73%Subtle intuitions are required to detect ambiguity when meanings are l...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: critical-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    Naturalistic and hermeneutic approaches see the relationship of the subject and object of inquiry as forcing the social scientist to take either the third-person or first-person perspective. However, critical social science necessarily requires complex perspective taking and the coordination of various points of view, minimally that of social scientists with the subjects under study. The “second-person perspective” differs from both third-person observer and the first-person participant perspect

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective