Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Affirmative responsibilities are mostly conditional impli... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Sound moral judgment requires that one's wishes be those of a person who understands opportunities and circumstances well, and whose intentions are not corrupted by sub-rational desires or deformations of will such as pride or presumption.

    Affirmative responsibilities are mostly conditional implications of the Golden Rule of doing to or for others what you would wish them to do to or for you.

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Affirmative responsibilities are conditioned by circumstances.One cannot make sound judgments about what one should be doing unless one's conc...One cannot make sound judgments about what one should be doing unless one's wish...Sound moral judgment requires that one's wishes be those of a person who underst...

    Similar

    Affirmative responsibilities are conditioned by circumstances.84%This notion has implications for what S ought to do or is obligated to...82%Moral responsibility does not require an ability to do otherwise.82%Imperfect duties require adopting certain ends rather than performing ...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aquinas-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    One’s affirmative responsibilities are all conditioned by circumstances, and mostly are (conditional) implications of the Golden Rule of doing to or for others what you would wish them to do to or for you. For both these reasons, one cannot make sound judgments about what one should be doing – that is, about what is the “mean” of reasonableness – unless one’s wishes are those of a person who understands the opportunities and the circumstances well, and whose concerns and intentions are those of

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective