Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Agent-relative consequentialism can justify the intuitive... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Agent-relative consequentialism captures commonsense moral intuitions in transplant-type cases better than agent-neutral consequentialism.

    Agent-relative consequentialism can justify the intuitive verdict that the transplant would be wrong for the doctor to perform.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Agent-relative consequentialism can justify the doctor's judgment that it would ...

    Related

    Agent-relative consequentialism can justify the doctor's judgment that it would ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Agent-relative consequentialism captures commonsense moral intuitions in transpl...
    Agent-relative consequentialism requires observers to adopt the agent's perspect...
    Commonsense moral intuitions hold that the doctor should not kill one patient to...

    Similar

    Agent-relative consequentialism can justify the doctor's judgment that...97%Agent-relative consequentialism captures commonsense moral intuitions ...86%Agent-relative consequentialism holds that an act is morally wrong if ...80%Agent-relative consequentialism requires observers to adopt the agent'...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: consequentialism
    View source passageHide passage
    This kind of case leads some consequentialists to introduce agent-relativity into their theory of value (Sen 1982, Broome 1991, Portmore 2001, 2003). To apply a consequentialist moral theory, we need to compare the world with the transplant to the world without the transplant. If this comparative evaluation must be agent-neutral, then, if an observer judges that the world with the transplant is better, the agent must make the same judgment, or else one of them is mistaken. However, if such evalu

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective