Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Agents often enter self-deception motivated by a desire that p be false (e.g., 'I want it not to be true that I am ill'), not merely a desire to believe p.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Desires for reality and desires for belief collapse together: wanting p false requires believing it possible, which requires some belief-desire about it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The distinction conflates causal motivation with intentional content; both desire-types could drive identical self-deceptive behavior mechanically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Parsimony favors single-desire explanations: desire to believe not-p adequately explains the evidence without positing desires about external facts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Desires about reality (wanting p false) are phenomenologically distinct from desires about belief (wanting to believe not-p).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Self-deception often persists even when the agent recognizes the belief is unjustified, suggesting motivation targets reality, not just mental states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Wishful thinking explains why agents resist evidence: they desire the world differ, not merely desire comforting thoughts about it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.