Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Alcmaeon's analogy between soul and heavenly bodies—which he explicitly calls self-moving—suggests self-motion is intrinsic to his cosmological framework.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Ancient analogies often highlight one feature without committing the analogist to the complete metaphysical framework of the analogate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Alcmaeon's surviving fragments are limited; claims about his 'framework' may extrapolate beyond textual evidence actually preserved.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Self-motion in heavenly bodies might explain only their observable behavior, not necessarily ground Alcmaeon's theory of the soul itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Alcmaeon explicitly designates heavenly bodies as 'self-moving,' indicating he theorizes autonomous motion as fundamental.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An analogy between soul and self-moving bodies suggests Alcmaeon attributes self-motion to the soul's essential nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Self-motion as intrinsic to both soul and cosmos indicates Alcmaeon integrated this principle throughout his cosmological system.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.