Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Alienation from God, the supreme good, would itself constitute maximal suffering for a conscious being whose nature is oriented toward that good.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Many report flourishing without belief in God, suggesting human suffering doesn't necessarily correlate with theological alienation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Physical pain, loss of loved ones, and severe injustice cause measurable suffering independent of any relationship to transcendent goods.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Calling alienation from God 'maximal suffering' unfalsifiably redefines suffering to match theological conclusions rather than evidence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Humans exhibit deep yearning for transcendent meaning that purely material goods cannot satisfy, suggesting orientation toward something supreme.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Separation from one's ultimate source of fulfillment causes documented psychological distress comparable to profound loss or deprivation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A being designed for union with its highest good would necessarily experience alienation from it as its worst possible state.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.