Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    All languages are conventional by nature — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Cognition of the terms of a per se nota proposition is not sufficient to ensure the causal mechanism that leads to evidence and certitude

    All languages are conventional by nature

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    3 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linkedConsciousness & Mind1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Cognition of the terms of a per se nota proposition is not sufficient to ensure ...It is possible to cognize terms whose signification remains unknown to the cogni...Species or cognitions cannot be treated as linguistic elements of thought

    Similar

    Language is purely conventional in nature.84%Such non-linguistic knowledge is not systematic in the way a shared co...80%Only conventional truth is capable of being articulated in language79%The Buddha's use of conventional language does not commit the Buddha t...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: crathorn
    View source passageHide passage
    Crathorn thus had to emend Ockham’s theory of evident knowledge, because intuitive cognition is no more the guarantee of any certitude regarding the existence of extramental things. In addition, the cognition of the terms of a proposition — even a per se nota proposition — is not sufficient, according to Crathorn, to ensure the causal mechanism that leads to evidence and certitude. Indeed, as we shall see below, Crathorn refuses to treat the species or cognitions as linguistic elements of though

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective