Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that All natural things, events, and states of affairs possess intrinsic value
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Intrinsic value requires a valuing subject or capacity for welfare; value cannot be mind-independently instantiated in non-sentient nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Natural things, events, and states of affairs include smallpox, earthquakes, and cancer, which lack any plausible welfare-grounding for intrinsic value.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The property of 'naturalness' cannot confer value without smuggling in a normative premise, committing the naturalistic fallacy Moore identified.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Deriving intrinsic value from the descriptive fact of being natural illicitly moves from an 'is' to an 'ought', violating Hume's guillotine.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Naturalness is itself a property that confers intrinsic value
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
All natural things, events, and states of affairs possess the property of naturalness
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.