Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Alston conflates 'no single well-grounded distribution' w... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Alston's argument that we have no well-grounded probability distribution over divine reasons entails that Bayesian disconfirmation claims here are formally ungrounded.

    Alston conflates 'no single well-grounded distribution' with 'no formal justification,' but robustness across multiple priors may still warrant disconfirmation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Alston's argument that we have no well-grounded probability distribution over di...

    Related

    Alston's argument that we have no well-grounded probability distribution over di...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective