Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Alternative theories (e.g., learners formulating grammati... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The poverty of the stimulus argument gives no more support to a nativist (UG-based) theory than to alternative non-nativist theories.

    Alternative theories (e.g., learners formulating grammatical hypotheses based on statistical information about the primary linguistic data and rejecting them for reasons other than outright falsification, such as lack of explicit confirmation or incoherence with other parts of the grammar) are equally compatible with the argument's negative conclusion.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Key Terms

    Explicit confirmation(as used in epistemology (the study of how we know things))
    Direct, clear-cut proof that something is true, rather than just assuming it's true because it hasn't been proven wrong.
    Hypotheses(as used in science and reasoning)
    Educated guesses or proposed explanations that can be tested to see if they're true or false.
    Negative conclusion(as used in logic and argumentation)
    The final claim that something does NOT exist or is NOT true, as opposed to a positive conclusion that affirms something.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Primary linguistic data(as used in linguistics and language learning theory)
    The actual examples of language that a person hears or reads when learning a language—basically, all the real sentences and conversations they're exposed to.
    Statistical information(as used in linguistics and learning theory)
    Patterns or trends that show up when you count or measure things across many examples—like noticing that certain words often appear together.
    falsification(Deductive logic applied to scientific hypothesis testing)
    The logical refutation of a hypothesis h_i by evidence, occurring when b·c·e jointly entail ~h_i, derived via modus tollens from h_i·b·c ⊨ ~e and the observation of e
    grammar(Emergentist view, contrasted with the Essentialist view of grammar as a psychologically real generative system.)
    An artifact developed by linguists to codify aspects of a linguistic system, not a structure internalized in the minds of speakers.
    incoherence(Illustrated by the coexistence of pro-slavery compromises and democratic/equality principles in the US Constitution.)
    The condition in which a legal or constitutional document contains provisions that are mutually inconsistent or in tension, resulting from the competing interests of those who drafted it.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    The argument is purely negative against Popperian learning strategies.The poverty of the stimulus argument gives no more support to a nativist (UG-bas...

    Similar

    Gold's negative results on language learnability are not merely a refl...81%Fallacy theory emphasizes faulty reasoning rather than good argument79%There are many ways to constrain learners' hypotheses about how their ...77%The Ur-language hypothesis weakens any argument from the existence of ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: innateness-language
    View source passageHide passage
    Thus arise two problems for the Chomskyan argument. First, it is not all that surprising to discover that if language learners employed a method of conjecture and refutation, then language could not be learned from the data. In other words, the poverty of the stimulus argument doesn't tell us much we didn't know already. Secondly, and as a result, the argument is quite weak: it makes the negative point that language acquisition does not occur via a Popperian learning strategy, but it favo

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective