Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Alvin Plantinga's own middle knowledge framework (Molinism) holds that God knows counterfactuals of creaturely freedom prior to creation.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
It's unclear what grounds the truth of counterfactuals about free choices prior to the agents' existence or decision-making context.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Molinism may still face a version of the grounding objection: what makes 'If Smith were in circumstance C, he'd freely choose X' true?
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The framework arguably adds unnecessary metaphysical machinery without empirically testable benefits over simpler theological models.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Molinism preserves human libertarian freedom by distinguishing God's knowledge from causal determination of choices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Counterfactuals of creaturely freedom are truth-apt propositions that God's omniscience must encompass to be truly complete.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Middle knowledge solves the theological problem of reconciling divine foreknowledge with genuine human freedom better than alternatives.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.